Tuesday, July 1, 2008

Hillary The Ten Million Dollar Whore

This story was sent in by the Blue Linchpin.  I love to read blogs because often you can find challenging commentary that would not appear in the mainstream press.  I find that certain bloggers are constantly able to challenge my view of certain issues, thus aiding my growth as a person.  There are some bloggers though that are more like a kind of mental virus, spreading inane ideas or conceptualizations. An example of one such blog is the Malignant Liberal Idiocy

Whether or not you are a fan of either Hillary or Barack descending to the point where you call them whores and johns invalidates any argument. By doing this you are appealing to sexism and racism to demean, rather than making a legitimate argument against their political positions. It is the appeal of a limited mind.

Prostitution isn’t just for Nevada anymore and this high-priced hooker leaves Elliot Spitzer’s flesh merchant in the dust! Hillary Clinton likely sets the record for most expensive (un-) happy hooker in history. $10 million is a lot of money, but Barry doesn’t have to pay the price for his pleasure, himself. On the contrary, he has asked his big donors to foot the bill ( or is it Bill) at the Clinton Cat House.

Right Hillary the "dirty girl". Why bother to even attack what she represented politically, it is far easier to just refer to her as a whore.  She was not actually trying to achieve something running for the POTUS, no she was selling herself and should be looked down upon for daring to step outside of her domestic duties as wife and mother. So let me make sure I get this right, liberal Hillary Clinton is a whore and  conservative McCain, who called his wife a cunt and is behind on his taxes is a morally upstanding person because he has a penis right? When white men run for political office, it is for the greater social good and when white women do it they are dirty whores. Yep, simple argument from a simple mind. Stupid is, as stupid does.

It is hard to believe that the dope of hope, the second coming, is dumb enough to believe he can buy the Clintons for $10 million. It is possible that this “trick” will be enough to help the political whore overcome her sense of entitlement to the highest office in the land… but I doubt it. Most likely, the Capitol Hill Call Girl won’t take this lying down. Hillary will accept the debt alleviating donations, say the required lines, and give the robotic smile, but what will her underlings do?

One, she cannot control what those that work under her do. Please take the time to tell me why endorsing Barack is considered whoredom when she does it? I don't see you referring to the many people who endorsed Barack as a whore. Typically when you loose the nomination of your party, you come together to endorse the winning candidate. I suggest that no matter what Hillary did, you would have found a problem with it simply because she is a woman.

Of course Barack is going to purchase her services because you know the black man cannot keep his greedy dick away from white pussy. He will fall all over himself to get it because the white woman is a prize. Foul isn't it, but that is the imagery that you are implying. They cannot escape such base accusations because arguments like yours are meant to constantly remind us that we are dealing with a white woman and a black man, and therefore any commerce between them is necessarily circumspect.

A person would have to be extremely trusting to believe that the wife of The Rapist would be content to let her entitled throne pass her by. Hilly didn’t “stand by her man” for nothing! The presidency is her destiny and I believe she will attempt to snatch it by “hook” or by crook.

Right, because you are privy to what happens inside of the Clinton marriage. One it is none of your damn business, and two you don't know for a fact that they do not have an open marriage. For all you know Hillary could have been having a happy little release in the tea room. Unless you are their marriage counsellor you have no right to speculate on why they are still together. But then moral judgements are your specialty, without that you would have no commentary would you?

Finally calling her a whore is an attempt to reduce who she is as a person. We are meant to think of a whore as a dirty, disgusting subhuman thing.  It is not the "John" that is a foul exploiter, nooo it is all the fault of the dirty, licentious, greedy cunt. That is what it comes down to for minds like yours...the cunt. They don't exist as real people, with emotions, with a history, no they are severed from all of that. They are just mindlessly roving, disease spreading, predatory  cunts.  The system in which we all live does not exploit women at all, or force them in anyway to make difficult choices for survival. If only we could only all learn to be dutifully submissive to our marginalization maybe we could escape the stigmatization  of  being whores.

10 comments:

bluelinchpin said...

Thank you for posting on this Womanist Musings! I knew you'd write about it more eloquently than I, and reach more people about it. :)

There is something vaguely encouraging when people resort to the lowest of insults and tactics, like the right has been doing this election...you know they can't think of a legitimate argument and you're on higher moral ground.

Sam Pierce said...

My, how we extrapolate! I write a simple criticism of Barack Obama's request to have his big donors pay off $10 million of the rapist's wife's debt (thus the prostitution) and you twist it into sexist and racist? $10 million for a favor has nothing to do with race or gender, but I do find both socialists equally vile.

An open marriage does not excuse rape, so I don't believe the credible allegations against the rapist made by Juanita Broderick are the moral equivalent to cigar games in The Oval Office.

As for John McCain, if I vote for him it is because he is not promising a plunge into Obamunism, not because I support him.

Thanks for the link!

bluelinchpin said...

Sam, if it had nothing to do with gender, then why resort to insults and calling her a hooker in the first place? That shows that what you're really trying to do is demean her as a woman, not a politician.

While I also disagree with Hilary's selling out to the healthcare industry a while back (though you're talking about something different), I feel no need to resort to sexist insults--that's below anyone who's point is valid.

Though, you do fail to point out that if Hilary is a 'hooker', so is almost every other politician on the face of the planet. But they're men, so they don't deserve being called that, do they?

Sam Pierce said...

The resorting to insults is due to the rapist's wife being a horrible person, which again has nothing to do with gender. Referring to her as a hooker seems to fit given that she apparently agreed to sell her support for $10 million.

Do all "feminists" ignore the plight of Juanita Broderick? Is your feminism limited to taking umbrage at the notion of Hillary Clinton being candidly discussed?

Renee said...

Do all "feminists" ignore the plight of Juanita Broderick? Is your feminism limited to taking umbrage at the notion of Hillary Clinton being candidly discussed?

I am more of capable of discussing Hillary critically however you did not make a critical observation you based your argument on sexist characterizations. If you can make an argument without being sexist I am more that willing to consider it.

Sam Pierce said...

It is amazing that a term such as "sexist" or "sexism" can be used as a magic excuse to avoid acknowledging a person's substance, or lack thereof. Do you think those imaginary snipers in Bosnia were shooting at Hillary because of sexism?

How do you feel about one of my heroes, Phyllis Schlafly?

Renee said...

Look no one is claiming that what Hilary said about facing fire in Bosnia is not problematic. In fact that was the first descent critique of her that you have made. The point Sam is that you can take issue with her political position, or question the veracity of her statements without calling her a whore.

As for Phyllis Shafly I cannot stand the woman and believe that she is the perfect example of internalized female hatred. Her arguments are particularly dependent on an essentialist understanding of gender and she is also clearly homophobic. I have not room in my heart for haters.

Sam Pierce said...

She sold her support for $10 million. Therefore she is a political whore. The fact that she was the front-runner for the nomination is not my fault. The fact that the deposed front-runner is a woman does not insulate her from criticism. If John Edwards was in the same position, I could have said the same thing, although I could see where you might take issue with that as well, given his girly-ness.

By the way, you reinforce my opinion of feminism by ignoring the questions about the plight of Juanita Broderick.

Renee said...

Re: Juanita Broderick...I had no idea who this woman was until moments ago when I googled her. I had no idea that she accused Clinton of rape. That she blames herself for inviting him up to her room is absolutely horrible
I am going to reiterate my point..criticizing Hillary should happen. No public official should ever escape scrutiny but framing that criticism in sexism is not productive and demeans not only the person that is attacked but the attacker as well. If you have any kind of respect for women at all you should be able to agree that sexism has no place in any debate.

Anonymous said...

Ӏ ԁroρ a comment when I еspеcіally
еnjoy a articlе on a site οr if I havе ѕοmеthing to valuablе to contribute to the
conveгsation. It's triggered by the fire displayed in the post I read. And on this post "Hillary The Ten Million Dollar Whore". I was excited enough to post a comment :-) I do have 2 questions for you if you don't
mind. Could it be simply mе or do a few of these remarks аppeаr likе they аrе cоming
from braіn deаd рeople?

:-P Anԁ, if you are wгiting on addіtional οnlіne ѕites, I'd like to follow anything new you have to post. Could you list the complete urls of all your public pages like your twitter feed, Facebook page or linkedin profile?

Feel free to surf to my webpage http://www.Scesports.com/groups/lolipop-brand-kids-clothes-by-anshus-designer-studio-946004473/