tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post1196368141656666995..comments2008-10-22T15:02:24.229-04:00Reneehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16388113393817266374noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-9025435599679146542008-10-22T15:02:24.229-04:002008-10-22T15:02:24.229-04:00One, even better:<BR/><BR/>http://racy.com/it-s-not-sarah-palin-doll.htmlSarahcudahttp://racy.com/it-s-not-sarah-palin-doll.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-69030793101181224102008-10-07T17:51:02.554-04:002008-10-07T17:51:02.554-04:00How about a real Sarah Palin Sex Doll<BR/>Check out this link http://www.bedroomjoys.com/sarah-palin-inflatable-love-doll.htmlinfohttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16555465601157840421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-54500944643189370412008-09-23T14:51:44.297-04:002008-09-23T14:51:44.297-04:00why is a mccain doll so creepy? is it because of his age? ageist hypocrites.. of course old people don't have sex do they.grahamnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-12014745974071134312008-09-14T23:32:19.652-04:002008-09-14T23:32:19.652-04:00Honestly the website has a few more offensive to women... Say a plastic action figure of a pantyless Britney Spears flashing the world.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-58377189719739376432008-09-11T15:36:18.432-04:002008-09-11T15:36:18.432-04:00interesting that original post refers to the vagina as a curse....thandiwenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06856230098435619555noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-57771599050256926732008-09-10T20:05:10.246-04:002008-09-10T20:05:10.246-04:00Men are fantasizing about fucking a famous woman. Quick, find the hidden subtext!gzeuskraistehttp://gzeuskraiste.livejournal.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-21025481902916506842008-09-10T19:52:59.031-04:002008-09-10T19:52:59.031-04:00It's Sarah Palin for Bob's sake. According to every man (and woman, for that matter) i've spoken to on the subject, she'd be in the top ten "people i'd never sexualise because it's creepy" list for most sane folk.<BR/><BR/>Come on. She's corrupt (supported that Airport Bridge for many years before she came out swinging against it), hypocritical (ditto), would put her "God" before reason (note many comments along these lines), uses her family as cheap stage assistants, even to the point of creating a media circus over her daughter's pregnancy, etc etc.<BR/><BR/>Of all the people that the hypothetical Male Sexualization and Rape Brigade are going to be drooling over and dreaming of violating, Sarah Palin is in about the bottom .00001 percent. If she's lucky.<BR/><BR/>Also, as other posters noted, there's also an Obama doll, a John Edwards doll, and a *wtf* McCain doll.Sidhttp://fantasticsid.myopenid.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-46340408273813233612008-09-10T16:02:33.227-04:002008-09-10T16:02:33.227-04:00Umm here's the thing. Sex Dolls are defined as "A sex doll (also love doll) is a type of sex toy in the size and shape of a sexual partner for aid in masturbation" <BR/>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_doll Maybe I obsessing about the language here, but sex dolls have holes to fuck. As far as I can tell, this thing certainly does not. I guess though that by calling it a sex doll, as opposed to a sexist doll/action figure wouldn't drive traffic to the site. <BR/><BR/>Obviously it is sexist. I agree with you there. But the same site has Sexy Action Obama, Sexy Action Edwards and even sexy Action McCain (shudders). Are those dolls, of equally ridiculous proportions, equally as sexist? (It is interesting that Obama is the only one without a shirt though...)mebelokonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11044958368295934969noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3486177601646533834.post-77987563688793818032008-09-10T15:25:21.635-04:002008-09-10T15:25:21.635-04:00Politics aside, why is it that strong women or women who are perceived to be strong must be reduced to objects?<BR/>When Hillary Clinton gave her speech at the Democratic National Convention, so many reports were of her pantsuit being an unflattering color.<BR/>There are surely more important issues in the world than whether we are sexy or wear the latest fashions.Mountain Womanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01135538968544231161noreply@blogger.com